Vernon Chalmers’ Existential Photography Exemplifies the Convergence of Art, Philosophy, and Personal Growth
 |
| The Blue Hour : Milnerton Lagoon, Cape Town |
This essay explores the existential and phenomenological depth of Vernon Chalmers’ photography, particularly his meditative explorations of coastal landscapes and birds in flight along South Africa’s Western Cape. Through an integration of art, philosophy, and personal growth, Chalmers’ photographic practice becomes an act of being — a visual phenomenology that foregrounds perception, embodiment, and lived temporality. Drawing on existential and phenomenological thinkers such as Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre, as well as contemporary photography theory, the analysis interprets Chalmers’ images not merely as aesthetic artefacts but as acts of self-transcendence and ontological inquiry. His photography emerges as a praxis of presence, where art and philosophy converge to illuminate human existence as both fragile and infinite in meaning.
1. Introduction: Photography as Existential InquiryPhotography, in its most profound form, is an existential act — a moment of confrontation with time, perception, and the self. Within this conceptual horizon, Vernon Chalmers’ photographic oeuvre occupies a unique philosophical and psychological space. His nature and coastal imagery, particularly the Birds in Flight series captured around Woodbridge Island and Milnerton Lagoon, articulate a dialogue between perception and being. The act of photographing becomes a process of seeing oneself see, a recognition of consciousness within the visual field (Merleau-Ponty, 1962).
Chalmers’ work invites a contemplative engagement that transcends mere representation. His photographs evoke questions about perception, presence, and existential meaning: How do we perceive the world, and how does the world perceive us in return? How does the camera mediate, or even transform, our being-in-the-world? Through these questions, Chalmers’ photography situates itself within the philosophical tradition of existential phenomenology, which seeks to understand the lived experience of consciousness and its relation to the world (Heidegger, 1962; Merleau-Ponty, 1968).
This essay argues that Chalmers’ existential photography exemplifies the convergence of art, philosophy, and personal growth. His photographic practice is not only an artistic pursuit but also a philosophical exercise and a process of self-formation — a journey through meaning, presence, and perception.
 |
| Yellow-Billed Duck in Flight : Diep River, Woodbridge Island |
2. The Existential Foundation of Chalmers’ Vision
Existentialism, as articulated by Sartre (1943) and Heidegger (1962), posits that existence precedes essence; that human beings are defined through their choices, their presence in the world, and their encounters with nothingness. Photography, in Chalmers’ context, becomes a mode of authentic existence — a creative act through which the photographer confronts both the transience of being and the continuity of perception.
Chalmers’ coastal photography, often depicting tranquil horizons, misted waters, and birds suspended mid-flight, reflects this existential tension. Each image captures the fragile temporality of existence — a fleeting gesture of life against the vast indifference of nature. Yet, rather than expressing alienation, Chalmers’ vision affirms presence and belonging. His images suggest that meaning is not imposed upon the world but discovered through a reciprocal act of seeing.
The existential significance of Chalmers’ work can also be situated within the broader philosophical discourse of authenticity. According to Heidegger, authenticity arises when one confronts the anxiety of existence and chooses to live in full awareness of being-toward-death. In this sense, Chalmers’ practice of returning daily to the same location, engaging the same subjects under changing light and weather, is an act of existential repetition and renewal — a Heideggerian dwelling in the presence of being. Photography becomes an existential discipline: a way to live authentically through attention and care.
3. Phenomenology and the Flesh of the WorldTo interpret Chalmers’ photography phenomenologically is to acknowledge the intertwining of perception and reality — what Merleau-Ponty (1968) calls the flesh of the world. For Merleau-Ponty, vision is not a detached optical mechanism but an embodied engagement with the visible. The photographer, in this framework, does not merely see the world but participates in it through the reciprocal act of perception.
Chalmers’ work, deeply rooted in the observation of natural phenomena, exemplifies this ontological intertwinement. His photographs do not present nature as an objectified landscape but as a living field of presence — a dynamic interplay of light, air, and movement. The reflective surface of water, the subtle tonal gradations of dawn light, and the delicate flight of a bird all testify to a phenomenological awareness of the world’s “visible tissue” (Merleau-Ponty, 1968, p. 147).
Through his lens, Chalmers captures the perceptual reciprocity between the observer and the observed. The image becomes a phenomenological trace of this encounter: not a fixed representation, but a lived moment of vision. The horizon, in particular, serves as a metaphor for the perceptual limit — that boundary where vision meets the invisible, where perception gestures toward transcendence.
In this sense, Chalmers’ photography becomes an act of embodied seeing — an art of presence that reveals how the world manifests itself to consciousness through the sensory and affective dimensions of perception. Each photograph invites the viewer into a shared perceptual field, collapsing the distance between subject and object, self and world.
 |
| Cabbage White Butterfly : Diep River, Woodbridge Island |
Presence, as an aesthetic and existential category, is central to Chalmers’ photographic ethos. His work resists the modern tendency toward distraction and speed, instead cultivating a contemplative rhythm that aligns with the temporality of natural phenomena. The slow observation of tides, the waiting for a bird’s flight, or the quiet witnessing of dawn all speak to a phenomenology of being present — of surrendering to time rather than mastering it.
In phenomenological terms, presence is never static; it is a temporal event, a continuous unfolding (Husserl, 1913). Chalmers’ photographs capture this unfolding through compositional stillness and temporal awareness. The long exposures of calm water, for instance, express the duration of perception — the way time accumulates in light. Similarly, the frozen wings of a bird mid-flight embody a paradox of motion and stillness, invoking Bergson’s (1911) notion of durée — lived time that resists mechanistic measurement.
The aesthetics of presence in Chalmers’ photography thus becomes a form of temporal meditation. It affirms that to see is to dwell in time, and to photograph is to embrace impermanence. As Roland Barthes (1981) suggests in Camera Lucida, the photograph always contains an awareness of mortality — a “that-has-been” which anchors it in existential temporality. Yet in Chalmers’ imagery, this awareness is not melancholic but affirming. It reveals that presence, however fleeting, is the ground of meaning.
5. Art as Self-Formation: Photography and Personal GrowthFor Chalmers, photography is not only an artistic practice but a process of personal growth — a means of self-understanding and transformation. His engagement with the coastal environment of Milnerton and Woodbridge Island is not driven by technical mastery alone, but by an ongoing dialogue between self and world. The camera, in this sense, becomes both a mirror and a window — reflecting inner states while opening onto the transcendence of being.
This process resonates with the existential concept of becoming. As Sartre (1943) argues, consciousness is always in a state of self-transcendence; it defines itself not by what it is, but by what it projects toward. Chalmers’ long-term photographic commitment embodies this notion of becoming through repetition and reflection. Each photograph is a step in a phenomenological journey — a renewed act of seeing that refines perception and expands awareness.
Moreover, the meditative quality of Chalmers’ practice aligns with psychological theories of mindfulness and flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The act of photographing — waiting for light, aligning composition, anticipating movement — requires full immersion in the present moment. This attentive state fosters a form of existential mindfulness, where the photographer experiences unity between action and awareness. Through photography, Chalmers cultivates not only artistic skill but also psychological well-being and existential coherence.
The convergence of art and self-development in Chalmers’ work reflects a broader humanist tradition in which creativity functions as a means of self-actualization (Maslow, 1968). His photography embodies the integration of aesthetic, philosophical, and personal dimensions of existence — an art of living that situates beauty within the practice of awareness.
 |
| Common Kestrel in Flight : Diep River, Woodbridge Island |
Among Chalmers’ recurring motifs, the bird in flight holds profound existential symbolism. In philosophical and psychological terms, flight represents freedom, transcendence, and the quest for meaning beyond the immediate confines of experience. Within existential phenomenology, this image can be interpreted as an allegory of consciousness itself — the movement of being toward its own possibility.
Each bird captured mid-flight embodies the tension between immanence and transcendence, between the groundedness of being and the freedom of becoming. The act of photographing such moments involves an aesthetic of anticipation — a readiness to respond to the unpredictable rhythms of nature. This responsiveness mirrors Heidegger’s (1971) concept of Gelassenheit — a receptive openness to the unfolding of Being.
Furthermore, the bird in flight functions as a metaphor for perception itself. Vision, like flight, is dynamic, directional, and open-ended. Through the bird’s movement, Chalmers visualizes the phenomenological movement of consciousness — always in motion, always exceeding itself. The viewer, drawn into this suspended moment, experiences a glimpse of transcendence within the finite frame.
The bird’s image, therefore, becomes both literal and symbolic: a natural subject and a philosophical gesture toward the infinite. Through it, Chalmers’ existential photography articulates a language of freedom that is both visual and ontological.
7. Existential Photography as Philosophical PraxisTo call Chalmers’ work existential photography is to recognize it as a philosophical praxis — an art that enacts, rather than merely illustrates, existential thought. His engagement with the world through the camera is not theoretical but lived; it is a method of inquiry that fuses perception, emotion, and reflection.
This mode of photography aligns with the phenomenological method of epoché — the suspension of preconceptions to encounter phenomena as they appear. In photographing the same landscape across time, Chalmers practices a visual form of epoché, allowing the world to disclose itself anew with each act of seeing. The repetitive nature of his observation becomes a discipline of perception, akin to a philosophical meditation on being.
Moreover, Chalmers’ commitment to experiential photography — engaging directly with light, weather, and motion — enacts a return to the world, countering the alienation often associated with modern technological mediation. His use of the camera, far from distancing, becomes a tool for attunement — a way of entering into resonance with the environment and one’s own existential rhythm.
In this sense, Chalmers’ photography is an ethics of seeing. It reminds the viewer that to photograph is to bear witness, to affirm the world’s presence even in its transience. Through this ethical vision, Chalmers bridges the gap between art and philosophy, transforming photography into a lived expression of existential care.
 |
| "A Tear of Love and Gratitude' : From 'A Love Palmed Named Gratitude" |
8. The Convergence of Art, Philosophy, and Psychology
Vernon Chalmers’ work stands at the intersection of three interwoven domains: art, philosophy, and psychology. Each informs and deepens the others within his practice.
- Art provides the language — the visual syntax through which perception and emotion are rendered visible. His compositional balance, tonal subtlety, and rhythm of form reveal a disciplined aesthetic sensitivity.
- Philosophy provides the grounding — an ontological awareness that informs his engagement with presence, being, and temporality. The existential-phenomenological framework enables him to approach photography not merely as representation but as participation in the unfolding of reality.
- Psychology provides the experiential dimension — the inner landscape of mindfulness, self-growth, and perceptual renewal. Chalmers’ process embodies psychological integration, revealing how creative attention transforms not only the image but the self who perceives it.
These three dimensions converge to form what might be called existential creativity — a holistic practice that unites the sensory, intellectual, and emotional dimensions of human experience. Through this convergence, Chalmers’ photography articulates a contemporary humanism that affirms life as meaningful through the very act of perceiving.
9. The Viewer’s Experience: Phenomenological ReceptionChalmers’ photography does not impose meaning upon the viewer but invites phenomenological participation. His images ask to be inhabited rather than merely viewed. The still horizon, the open expanse of sky, and the poised bird evoke spaces of contemplation in which the viewer’s own perception becomes active.
In this regard, the photograph functions as a mirror of consciousness. As Merleau-Ponty (1964) asserts, vision is reversible — the seer and the seen intertwine in a shared visibility. The viewer, encountering Chalmers’ imagery, becomes aware not only of the scene depicted but of their own perceptual presence. This self-awareness is the hallmark of phenomenological art: it transforms perception into reflection.
Moreover, Chalmers’ imagery encourages what Barthes (1981) calls the punctum — that affective detail which pierces the viewer, evoking an immediate, personal resonance. The quiet simplicity of Chalmers’ compositions allows such puncta to emerge naturally: a ripple of water, a shadowed wing, a slant of dawn light. These moments provoke existential reflection, drawing the viewer into a shared awareness of mortality, transience, and beauty.
 |
| The Majestic Grey Heron : Milnerton Lagoon, Cape Town |
Ultimately, Vernon Chalmers’ existential photography invites us to reconsider the ontology of the photographic act. Photography, in his hands, becomes a medium of being-with — a practice that integrates perception, thought, and existence. The camera is not a barrier but a bridge, extending human awareness into the visible world.
In a time dominated by technological image production and digital distraction, Chalmers’ contemplative approach offers a counterpoint: a return to presence, slowness, and attention. His photography embodies a philosophy of care — a way of seeing that honors both the fragility and the radiance of being.
This philosophy aligns with Heidegger’s (1971) notion of poiesis, the bringing-forth of truth through art. Each photograph, as a work of poiesis, reveals the world’s hidden dimensions — the stillness within motion, the eternal within the ephemeral. Chalmers’ existential practice thus reclaims photography as a site of ontological revelation, where meaning arises not from representation but from relation.
11. Conclusion: The Existential Art of SeeingVernon Chalmers’ journey through meaning, presence, and perception demonstrates that photography, when pursued with philosophical depth and psychological awareness, transcends the boundaries of visual art. His existential photography exemplifies the fusion of artistic creation, phenomenological reflection, and personal growth, affirming that to see the world truly is to participate in its being.
Through his meditative engagement with light, movement, and nature, Chalmers transforms photography into a practice of existential awareness — an art of presence that mirrors the unfolding of consciousness itself. His work teaches that perception is not merely a way of capturing the world but a way of becoming within it.
In the convergence of art, philosophy, and personal growth, Chalmers’ photography offers more than aesthetic pleasure; it becomes a path toward wisdom — a visual phenomenology of existence that reveals the sacred in the everyday, the infinite within the finite, and the profound meaning of simply being present." (Source: ChatGPT 2025)
ReferencesBarthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Hill and Wang.
Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. Macmillan.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Allen & Unwin.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.
Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and nothingness. Gallimard.